Arbitrum Analytic Dashboard
  • Overview
    • Introduction
  • Metrics
    • Holder Metrics
    • Voting Power Metrics
    • Proposal Metrics
    • Participation Metrics
    • Delegate
      • Delegate Profile
    • Voting Behavior
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Table of All Proposals:
  • Proposal Name:
  • End Date:
  • Status:
  • Proposal Result:
  • Proposal Category:
  • Proposal Subcategory:
  1. Metrics

Proposal Metrics

PreviousVoting Power MetricsNextParticipation Metrics

Last updated 6 months ago

This section presents data on governance proposals, including their distribution by category, voting results, and proposer activity. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the types of proposals submitted, their outcomes, and the level of engagement from the community.


Distribution of Proposals by Category: Categorizes governance proposals by topic.

Voting Results of the Proposal: Overview of voting outcomes, showing consensus levels or division among token holders. Classifies results as contentious, generally accepted, or normal.

Unique Proposers: Indicates the range of individuals or entities participating in governance proposals. This help highlight varying levels of engagement among proposers.

  • One time: Proposers who've initiated a single proposal, asa percentage of all proposal.

  • Two times: Proposers who've made two proposals, as a percentage of all proposal.

  • More than 2 times: Proposers who've made more than two proposals, as a percentage of all proposal.

Table of All Proposals:

Proposal Name:

Name of the proposal.

End Date:

Date when voting ends.

Status:

Active: Proposal is live and open for voting.

Succeeded: Proposal has received more votes in favor and surpassed the quorum requirement.

Failed: Opposite of succeeded; did not meet the quorum or had more votes against.

Proposal Result:

Dominant: Proposals where the result is ≥ 90% in either direction.

Majority: Proposals where the result is ≥ 70% but < 90% in either direction.

Contentious: Proposals where the result is < 70% in either direction.

Proposal Category:

  • Community & Ecosystem Growth: Initiatives aimed at expanding, nurturing the community and overall ecosystem.

  • Governance: Activities and updates related to the decision-making and policy-setting processes within the DAO.

  • Grants: Funding provided to support various projects or community program initiatives.

  • Incentives: Programs designed to reward and encourage participation from community members.

  • Operations: Activities related to the management and operational functions of the DAO.

  • Protocol Upgrades: Enhancements made to improve the protocol’s functionality and performance.

  • R&D (Research and Development): Innovative research activities to improve current technology or explore new ideas.

  • Treasury: Management, allocation, and strategic use of financial resources within the DAO.

Proposal Subcategory:

  • Arb Staking: Staking mechanisms related to ARB tokens to support network security and participation.

  • Code of Conduct (CoC) Update: Revisions or updates to the community's rules and ethical guidelines.

  • Community Engagement: Efforts to foster interaction and participation among community members.

  • DAO Operations Support: Activities that help in the smooth running of the DAO's functions.

  • DAO Tooling & Interfaces: Development of tools and interfaces that help members interact with the DAO more effectively.

  • Delegate Incentives: Programs or rewards designed to encourage delegate participation.

  • Ecosystem Partnerships: Collaborations with external projects or organizations to strengthen the ecosystem.

  • Election: Processes involving voting for positions or roles within the DAO.

  • Event: Community or industry events that are hosted or supported by the DAO.

  • Experimental Programs: Pilot projects or initiatives designed to test new ideas.

  • Foundation Budget: Allocation of resources for foundational or core operational needs.

  • Gaming: Projects or initiatives related to blockchain gaming within the ecosystem.

  • Gaming Catalyst Programs: Initiatives focused on driving growth in the Web3 gaming development and infrastructure on the Arbitrum network.

  • Governance Update: Announcements or changes to governance policies or structures.

  • Governance Upgrade: Significant improvements to governance systems or mechanisms.

  • Incentive Program: Specific programs that offer incentives for participating in various activities.

  • Infrastructure Development: Building and maintaining the essential technology and support systems.

  • LTIPP (Long Term Incentive Pilot Program): The LTIPP provides ARB token incentives to support and grow projects within the Arbitrum ecosystem.

  • Misuse of Funds: Addressing or preventing the inappropriate use of the DAO's financial resources.

  • Multichain Integration: Efforts to connect the Arbitrum network with orbit chain and other blockchain networks.

  • NFT Integration: Initiatives aimed at incorporating non-fungible tokens into the ecosystem.

  • Onchain Upgrade: Upgrades or updates that are directly implemented on the blockchain.

  • Procurement: The process of acquiring goods or services needed by the DAO.

  • Program Funds: Financial resources allocated for specific programs or initiatives.

  • Protocol Enhancement: Specific improvements or updates made to the Arbitrum protocol.

  • Redistribution: The reallocation or distribution of funds within the DAO.

  • Research Initiatives: Projects focused on exploring new ideas and gaining deeper insights.

  • Security Improvement: Measures aimed at increasing the security of the protocol and DAO operations.

  • STIP (Short Term Incentive Program): The STIP provides ARB token incentives to active protocols on Arbitrum to boost ecosystem growth in the short term.

  • Treasury Funded Expense: Costs that are covered by the DAO's treasury for various strategic purposes.

  • Treasury Management: Oversight and administration of the DAO's financial resources.

  • Voter Enfranchisement: Efforts to empower and increase voting participation among stakeholders.